Criminal procedure: defendant's appearance by video.
Summary
Existing law generally requires a defendant in a criminal trial in which a felony is charged to be present at the arraignment, at the time of plea, during the preliminary hearing, during those portions of the trial when evidence is taken before the trier of fact, and at the time of the imposition of sentence. Existing law requires the accused to be personally present at all other proceedings unless he or she executes a written waiver of his or her right to be personally present. Existing law authorizes a court to permit the initial court appearance and arraignment of a defendant held in any state, county, or local facility within the county on felony or misdemeanor charges, except for those defendants who were indicted by a grand jury, to be conducted by 2-way electronic audiovideo communication between the defendant and the courtroom in lieu of the physical presence of the defendant in the courtroom. Existing law requires the defendant to execute a written waiver if the defendant decides not to exercise the right to be physically present in the courtroom to make his or her plea. Existing law requires the attorney of a defendant so held to be present in court during the hearing for an initial court appearance and arraignment if the attorney is not present with the defendant. Existing law, notwithstanding this provision, requires the attorney to be present with the defendant in any county exceeding 4,000,000 persons in population. This bill would delete the requirement that the attorney be present in any county exceeding 4,000,000 persons in population. The bill would authorize a defendant who does not wish to be personally present for noncritical portions of the trial when no testimonial evidence is taken to submit an oral waiver in open court prior to the proceeding, or submit a written request to the court and would allow the court to grant the request in its discretion. The bill would allow a court, when a defendant has waived the right to be personally present, to require the appearance of a defendant held in any state, county, or local facility within the county on felony or misdemeanor charges to be conducted by 2-way electronic audiovideo communication between the defendant and the courtroom in lieu of the physical presence of the defendant in the courtroom for noncritical portions of the trial. If the defendant is represented by counsel, the bill would not require the attorney to be personally present with the defendant for noncritical portions of the trial, if the audiovideo conferencing system or other technology allows for private communication between the defendant and the attorney. The bill would state that it does not expand or limit the right of a defendant to be personally present with his or her counsel at a particular proceeding as required by the California Constitution.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Jun 2014
Signed into Law
Jul 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Signed Jul 21, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Jun 26, 2014 · Assembly May 19, 2014
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 40
Jun 26, 2014
D
Democratic28
71% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jul 21, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5735.).
lower
Jun 26, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-8)
senate
Jun 26, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 15, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
Jun 2, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 19, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-3)
assembly
May 8, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Mar 10, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Frazier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2397
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2397. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline