Low Carbon Fuel Standard: Green Credit Reserve.
Summary
Existing law requires that the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, in partnership with the State Air Resources Board, and in consultation with specified state agencies, develop and adopt a state plan to increase the use of alternative fuels, as defined, not later than June 30, 2007. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 establishes the State Air Resources Board as the state agency responsible for monitoring and regulating sources emitting greenhouse gases. The act requires the state board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit, as defined, to be achieved by 2020, equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions levels in 1990. The state board is additionally required to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Pursuant to the act, the state board has adopted the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulations. Under federal law, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. This bill would require the Treasurer, by June 30, 2015, to establish a Low Carbon and Renewable Fuels Credit Reserve (Green Credit Reserve or Reserve) to facilitate and encourage the development of renewable and low carbon transportation fuels produced in California from in-state feedstocks by providing stability and predictability for the value of credits generated by the production of those fuels pursuant to the low-carbon fuel standard and the federal renewable fuel standard. The bill would provide for the Green Credit Reserve to enter into specified contracts with developers of projects that are intended to produce renewable and low-carbon transportation fuels that qualify for state and federal low-carbon or renewable fuel credits, and that will commit the Reserve to purchase the LCFS and RFS credits at a contracted price when the renewable fuel is produced and the credits are certified.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
May 2014
Assembly Failed
May 2014
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Last action May 29, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2014
How they voted
23–37
Failed · 17 other
Total votes 77
May 29, 2014
D
Democratic55
41% Yea
R
Republican22
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
6
May 29, 2014
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (23-37-17)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 7).
lower
Mar 10, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Al Muratsuchi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2390
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2390. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline