Wage garnishment: restrictions: student loans.
Summary
The Wage Garnishment Law prescribes the procedure for withholding an employee's earnings for purposes of paying a debt. The law requires that a levy of execution upon the earnings of an employee be made by service of an earnings withholding order upon the employer. An earnings withholding order is issued by a levying officer upon receiving an application submitted by a judgment creditor, as specified. An employer is required, except as otherwise provided by statute, to withhold the amounts required by an earnings withholding order from all earnings of the employee payable for any pay period of the employee which ends during the withholding period. This bill would provide that an earnings withholding order shall not be used for purposes of enforcing a judgment for the collection of debt that is from a student loan that is not made, insured, or guaranteed by the United State Government pursuant to the Federal Family Education Loan Program or the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. The bill would require a court to terminate or modify an earnings withholding order issued on or after July 1, 2014, if the court determines, upon a request by the judgment debtor pursuant to specified requirements and procedures, that the withholding order enforces a judgment in violation of these provisions. The bill would provide that a judgment creditor is liable to the judgment debtor for all amounts collected by the judgment creditor in violation of these provisions. The bill also would make conforming changes.
Bill status
failed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2013
Assembly Passage
Apr 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2013
Last action Aug 28, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly Apr 11, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 11, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Jun 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 10, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 28, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Apr 25, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-20-4)
assembly
Apr 8, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 2).
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 15, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 233
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 233. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline