Proposition 65: enforcement.
Summary
(1) The existing Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65) prohibits any person, in the course of doing business, from knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without giving a specified warning, or from knowingly discharging or releasing such a chemical into water or any source of drinking water, except as specified. The act imposes civil penalties of not more than $2,500 per day upon persons who violate those prohibitions, and provides for the enforcement of those prohibitions by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or specified city attorneys or prosecutors, and by any person in the public interest. The act requires any person bringing an action in the public interest, or any private person filing an action in which a violation of the act is alleged, to notify the Attorney General, the district attorney, city attorney, or prosecutor in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have occurred, and the alleged violator that such an action has been filed. This bill would require a person filing an enforcement action in the public interest for certain specified exposures to provide a notice in a specified proof of compliance form. The bill would prohibit an enforcement action from being filed by that person, and would prohibit the recovery of certain payments or reimbursements, if the notice to the alleged violator alleges a failure to provide a clear and reasonable warning for those specified exposures and, within 14 days after receiving the notice, the alleged violator corrects the alleged violation, pays a civil penalty in the amount of $500 per facility or premises, and notifies the person bringing the action that the violation has been corrected pursuant to the specified proof of compliance form. The bill would specify that the alleged violator may correct the violation, pay the civil penalty, and serve a correction notice on the person who served notice of the violation only one time for a violation arising from the same exposure in the same facility or on the same premises. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on April 1, 2019, and at each 5-year interval thereafter, to adjust that civil penalty, as specified. (2) Proposition 65 provides that it may be amended by a statute, passed in each house by 23 vote, to further its purposes. This bill would find and declare that it furthers the purposes of Proposition 65 and would make other findings regarding the purposes of the bill. The bill would declare that a specified provision of the bill is independent and severable from the other changes made by this bill. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 4, 2013
Signed Oct 5, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly May 24, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Sep 10, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
12
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Oct 5, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3203.).
lower
Sep 10, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Sep 10, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
upper
May 24, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-6)
assembly
May 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 15).
lower
May 9, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 7, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and JUD.
lower
Feb 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 227
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 227. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline