Agricultural products: direct marketing: community-supported agriculture.
Summary
Existing law encourages the Department of Food and Agriculture to assist producers in organizing certified farmers' markets, field retail stands, farm stands, and other forms of direct marketing by providing technical advice on marketing methods and in complying with the regulations that affect direct marketing programs. This bill would also encourage the department to assist in organizing community-supported agriculture. The bill would require producers that market whole produce, shell eggs, or processed foods through single-farm or multi-farm community-supported agriculture programs, as defined, to register annually with the department as a California direct marketing producer, and, among other things, to specify whether the producer is part of a single-farm community-supported agriculture program or a multi-farm community-supported agriculture program. The bill would impose specified requirements relating to the labeling and maintenance of consumer boxes and containers that are used in community-supported agriculture programs to deliver farm products, and would require a registered California direct marketing producer to maintain records of the contents and origin of all of the items included in each consumer box or container in accordance with department regulations. The bill would require a registered California direct marketing producer to pay an annual registration fee of up to $100, as provided, to be deposited in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, which would be used by the department for the administration of the bill's provisions. The bill would require the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to file an order to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations relating to the fee with the Office of Administrative Law, and would require the order to be filed with the Secretary of State in accordance with specified provisions. Existing law, the California Retail Food Code, establishes food safety requirements, and requires food to be obtained from approved sources, as defined. Existing law provides for the enforcement of the California Retail Food Code by enforcement officers, as defined, which includes the State Department of Public Health. Funds collected by the State Department of Public Health pursuant to those provisions are deposited in the Food Safety Fund for use by the State Department of Public Health, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of carrying out and implementing inspection provisions, as specified. This bill would specify that a registered California direct marketing producer is an approved source, subject to compliance with specified provisions of law, and would also specify that any whole uncut fruit or vegetable or unrefrigerated shell egg grown or produced in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and food safety guidelines shall be deemed to be from an approved source. The bill would authorize enforcement officers to enter and inspect a community-supported agriculture program in response to a public food safety complaint, and would authorize the enforcement officer to recover reasonable costs associated with that inspection from the registered California direct marketing producer operating the community-supported agriculture program. Because a violation of various provisions regulating direct marketing, including requirements relating to labeling and shipping products and preparing and submitting specified documents, is a crime, this bill would create new crimes and would therefore impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 4, 2013
Signed Sep 28, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2013 · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Sep 9, 2013
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Sep 28, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3095.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 26, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 15, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 8, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Apr 25, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Apr 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 15, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Feb 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 224
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 224. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline