Counties: database: information regarding general ad valorem property tax revenues.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. This bill would require each county to make available to taxpayers on its Internet Web site a graph visualization of how general ad valorem property tax revenues are allocated countywide at a summarized jurisdictional level, and to update the graph annually and work to improve the appearance, organization, and clarity of the information provided. This bill would require each county's Internet Web site to provide taxpayers with certain information about general ad valorem property tax revenues and the types of programs and services funded with general ad valorem property tax revenues, and to include a link to the final county budget document where more information about specific programs and services is detailed. By imposing new duties upon county officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Vetoed Sep 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2014 · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Aug 26, 2014
D
Democratic26
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6564.).
lower
Aug 26, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-5)
senate
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 11, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
May 7, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 10, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Phil Ting
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2211
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2211. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline