Money Transmission Act.
Summary
Existing law, the Money Transmission Act, provides for the regulation of money transmissions and, unless an exemption applies, requires the licensure by the Commissioner of Business Oversight of persons, including corporations and limited liability companies, to engage in this activity. Existing law declares the need to regulate money transmission businesses in the state, to maintain public confidence in financial institutions doing business in this state, and to preserve the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of California. Under existing law, a licensee under the act is required to file various reports with the commissioner with specified information, including the total volume of activities, number of transactions conducted, and outstanding money transmissions in California and the United States in a given calendar year quarter, as specified. Existing law makes it a felony to intentionally make a false statement, misrepresentation, or false certification in a record filed or required to be maintained under the act, or to knowingly engage in an activity for which a license is required without being licensed or exempt from licensure. This bill would exempt from the requirements of the act a transaction in which the recipient of the money or other monetary value is an agent of the payee pursuant to a preexisting written contract and delivery of the money or other monetary value to the agent satisfies the payor's obligation to the payee. The bill would revise and reorganize various provisions of the act relating to, among other things, the definition of relevant terms under the act and the required contents of license applications and customer receipts. The bill would require that the report described above also include, if feasible, whether an outstanding money transmission was conducted via a mobile application or an Internet Web site. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would authorize the commissioner to exercise any power set forth in the act with respect to a money transmission business, if necessary for the general welfare of the public, regardless of the licensure status of the money transmission business. The bill would revise provisions relating to the commissioner's authority to provide guidance to prospective applicants for a license to operate a money transmission business. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Signed Sep 20, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 13, 2014 · Assembly Aug 18, 2014
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 13, 2014
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Sep 20, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 18, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-1)
assembly
Aug 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6103.).
lower
Aug 13, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 13, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 9, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2209
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2209. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline