Employment applications: criminal history.
Summary
Existing law prohibits both public and private employers from asking an applicant for employment to disclose, either in writing or verbally, any information concerning an arrest or detention that did not result in a conviction. This bill, commencing July 1, 2014, would prohibit a state or local agency from asking an applicant to disclose information regarding a criminal conviction, except as specified, until the agency has determined the applicant meets the minimum employment qualifications for the position. The bill would include specified findings and declarations of the Legislature in support of this policy. Because this bill would impose new requirements on local agencies relative to employment application procedures, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 4, 2013
Signed Oct 10, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2013 · Assembly May 30, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 12, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
12
Oct 10, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-25-1)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 24).
lower
May 1, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 2).
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 218
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 218. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline