Fire protection: residential care facilities.
Summary
Existing law establishes the State Fire Marshal within the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and sets forth its duties, including, but not limited to, administering provisions relating to inspection and approval of fire protection measures for health and community care facilities. Existing law, with certain exceptions, prohibits a person, firm, or corporation from establishing, maintaining, or operating any hospital or other specified care facility for more than 6 guests or patients, and prohibits the operation of a residential care facility for the elderly housing nonambulatory persons that is licensed to care for more than 6 persons, unless it has, among other things, an automatic fire sprinkler or extinguishing system approved by the State Fire Marshal. Existing law generally places responsibility for enforcing State Fire Marshal building standards upon prescribed local agencies and provides for inspection fees. A violation of existing provisions related to fire protection requirements is a crime. This bill would require a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined, or an adult residential facility, as defined, that has a valid license as of January 1, 2015, to have installed and maintained on and after January 1, 2019, an operable automatic fire sprinkler system approved by the State Fire Marshal. The bill would require a residential care facility, as defined, for which a license is newly issued on or after January 1, 2018, to have an approved, operable automatic fire sprinkler system. The bill would require the licensee of a facility to pay all costs associated with compliance with these provisions. The bill would limit specified inspection fees related to the sprinkler systems. The bill would require, by January 1, 2017, the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations to implement the above provisions. By changing the definition of a crime, the bill would impose a state‑mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Last action Jun 5, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
2
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Apr 23, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on G.O. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and G.O.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SF
Steve Fox
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2162
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2162. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline