Nurses and certified nurse assistants: overtime.
Summary
Existing law generally requires the workweek of state employees to be 40 hours, and the workday of state employees to be 8 hours. Under existing law, it is the policy of the state to avoid the necessity for overtime work whenever possible. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, prohibit a nurse, defined as a registered nurse or a licensed vocational nurse, or a certified nursing assistant (CNA) , employed by the State of California in a state facility, as defined, from being compelled to work in excess of the regularly scheduled workweek or work shift, except under certain circumstances, including the occurrence of a catastrophic event in a state facility. This bill would prohibit a state facility from discriminating, dismissing, discharging, or making an employment decision adverse to the nurse or CNA for his or her refusal to accept those additional hours, and would specify that a refusal to accept those additional hours does not constitute patient abandonment or neglect, as specified. The bill would require management and supervisors to consider employees in a specified order of priority in order to fulfill the additional staffing needs of a facility. This bill would enact other related provisions. The bill would make a statement of legislative intent with regards to prohibiting mandatory overtime for nurses and CNAs employed by the State of California in a state facility.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Vetoed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2014 · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
23–8
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Aug 21, 2014
D
Democratic26
88% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 56. Noes 22. Page 6511.).
lower
Aug 21, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-8-5)
senate
Aug 21, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 23 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-21-2)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 13, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sebastian Ridley-Thomas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2155
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2155. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline