Counties: search or rescue: costs.
Summary
Existing law provides that persons whose specified actions cause an incident resulting in an appropriate emergency response is liable for the expenses of an emergency response by a public agency to the incident, up to $12,000 per incident. Existing law provides that the board of supervisors of a county may authorize the sheriff to search for and rescue persons, and that the expenses incurred by the sheriff in the performance of those duties are a proper county charge. Existing law also requires the county or city and county of residence of a person, searched for or rescued by a sheriff, to pay to the county or city and county conducting the search or rescue all of the reasonable search or rescue expenses in excess of $100 within 30 days after the submission of a reimbursement claim. This bill, notwithstanding the existing provisions relating to liability for specified emergency response expenses, would provide that whenever a county or city and county either receives a reimbursement claim from another county or city and county for a search or rescue, or conducts its own search or rescue, of one of its residents who is 16 years of age or older, the county or city and county may in turn seek reimbursement for the actual costs incurred from that resident, if the need for the search or rescue necessitated the use of extraordinary methods and was caused by specified acts or omissions. The bill would require the resident to pay within 30 days after being billed. This bill would prohibit the county or city and county from collecting reimbursement from persons whom the county or city and county determines are unable to pay the charges. The bill would prohibit a county or city and county from billing a resident more than $12,000, adjusted annually for inflation as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations, for a search or rescue, unless the search or rescue is the result of a criminal violation punishable as a felony. This bill would provide that the county or city and county may only seek reimbursement if the board of supervisors of that county or city and county passes an ordinance consistent with this bill.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Vetoed Sep 27, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 13, 2014 · Assembly May 19, 2014
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Aug 13, 2014
D
Democratic28
85% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 6102.).
lower
Aug 13, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
senate
Aug 13, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 19, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-7)
assembly
May 12, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 7).
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2151
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2151. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline