Pharmacy licenses: letters of reprimand.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the regulation and licensure of pharmacists by the California State Pharmacy Board. Existing law authorizes the board to refuse to license an applicant guilty of unprofessional conduct or to issue, at its sole discretion, a probationary license to an applicant who has met all other licensure requirements. This bill would authorize the board to issue a license to an applicant who has committed minor violations that the board deems, in its discretion, do not merit the denial of a license or require probationary status, and to concurrently issue a public letter of reprimand, as specified. The bill would require the letter of reprimand to, among other things, describe in detail the nature and facts of the violation and inform the licensee that he or she may accept the letter of reprimand without challenge or, within 30 days of service of the letter, submit a written request for an office conference to contest the letter of reprimand. The bill requires the executive director of the board, or his or her designee, to hold an office conference with the licensee and his or her legal counsel or authorized representative, if any, within 30 days of receipt of the request, as specified. The bill authorizes the executive officer, or his or her designee, to affirm, modify, or withdraw the letter of reprimand and requires the executive officer, or his or her designee, to provide the licensee with a written decision within 14 calendar days from the date of the office conference. The bill would require a letter of reprimand issued concurrently with a board license to be purged 3 years from the date of issuance, as specified. The bill would require a letter of reprimand to be disclosed to an inquiring member of the public and posted on the board's Internet Web site.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 8, 2014
How they voted
64–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 8, 2014
D
Democratic50
92% Yea
R
Republican20
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jun 2, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 22, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 8, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
Apr 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 8, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 3, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 2, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2131
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2131. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline