Domestic violence: protective orders.
Summary
The Domestic Violence Prevention Act authorizes a judicial officer to issue a protective order after notice and a hearing for the purpose of preventing a recurrence of domestic violence and sexual abuse and ensuring a period of separation of the persons involved, based on an affidavit showing reasonable proof of past abuse. The act defines domestic violence as abuse perpetrated against specified persons, and further defines abuse within that context. Existing law requires, under certain circumstances, the clerk of the court to submit the proof of service of a protective order directly into the Department of Justice Domestic Violation Restraining Order System. This bill would instead authorize the issuance of a protective order after notice and a hearing for the purpose of preventing acts of domestic violence, abuse, and sexual abuse and ensuring a period of separation of the persons involved. The bill would provide that, in determining whether to grant or deny a protective order, the length of time since the most recent act of abuse is not, by itself, determinative. The bill would also require the trial court, if the court denies a petition to issue a protective order, to provide a brief statement of the reasons for its decision either in writing or on the record. Existing law authorizes the court to issue a mutual order enjoining the parties from specific acts of abuse if both parties personally appear, each party presents written evidence of abuse or domestic violence, and the court makes detailed findings of fact indicating that both parties acted primarily as aggressors and that neither party acted primarily in self-defense. This bill would provide that, for the purposes of these provisions, a court should consider specified provisions relating to dominant aggressors in determining if both parties acted primarily as aggressors.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Signed Sep 26, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2014 · Assembly May 8, 2014
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
Aug 21, 2014
D
Democratic28
85% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
12
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Sep 26, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6353.).
lower
Aug 21, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-6)
senate
Aug 21, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 23 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 16, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
May 28, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 22, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 8, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-4)
assembly
Apr 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 10, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 3, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Quirk
DDemocratic
Co
Hannah-Beth Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2089
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2089. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline