Civil service: employee hearings.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the State Personnel Board to hold hearings and make investigations concerning matters relating to the administration of the civil service. These provisions require, among other things, that a hearing or investigation be commenced within a reasonable time after the filing of the petition whenever a hearing or investigation is conducted in regard to an appeal by an employee. Existing law also authorizes an employee to make a written request for a priority hearing by the board for an appeal of an action that resulted in the employee's termination if an evidentiary hearing has not commenced within 6 months of the filing of the appeal and requires the board to schedule an evidentiary hearing within 60 days. In an appeal to the board, the appointing power bears the burden of proof that the employee was discharged for good cause. Under existing law, an employee, under certain circumstances, may seek a writ of mandate with the courts if the board does not render a decision within the statutory time limits. Under existing case law, the employee has the burden of proof in the writ of mandate proceedings that the adverse action against him or her was not supported by good cause. This bill would provide that the appointing power has the burden of proof in a proceeding for a writ of mandate brought by an employee when the board has not rendered a decision within the above-described time limit.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Apr 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Vetoed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 7, 2014 · Assembly Apr 10, 2014
How they voted
24–6
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Aug 7, 2014
D
Democratic26
76% Yea
R
Republican10
60% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 15. Page 6035.).
lower
Aug 7, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-6-6)
senate
Aug 7, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 19, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 10, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-14-2)
assembly
Apr 2, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 2).
lower
Mar 3, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2032
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2032. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline