Alcoholic beverages: beer returns: product quality: beer manufacturers: duplicate licenses.
Summary
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, generally permits a wholesaler or manufacturer to accept the return of beer from a retailer only if the beer is returned in exchange for the identical quantity and brand of beer. Existing law permits a credit memorandum to be issued when a package is broken or damaged when the return and corrections are completed within 15 days, as specified. Existing law provides exceptions from this limitation, including permitting the return of beer by a retailer to a seller, and by a seller to a manufacturer or importer, if the beer is recalled or presents a health or safety issue, as provided. This bill would extend the exception provided for beer that is recalled or presents a health and safety issue, as described above, to beer that has product quality issues, subject to Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control approval. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Existing law requires a license or permit to manufacture beer, unless the beer is manufactured for personal or family use, under specified conditions. A licensed beer manufacturer may sell beer to consumers at a branch location. Existing law requires the department to issue a duplicate license to a beer manufacturer if the beer manufacturer applies for a duplicate license. Under existing law, for 30 days from the date of the issuance of a duplicate license, retail sales of beer are prohibited at a branch office for which the duplicate license was issued. The act provides that a violation of its provisions is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would, instead, allow the department to issue a duplicate license at its discretion where specified privileges are to be exercised at the branch office. The bill would prohibit the sale or tasting of alcoholic beverages to consumers at more than 6 branch office locations, and allow 2 of the branch office locations to be bona fide eating places owned and operated by and for the beer manufacturer, as provided. The bill would require the department to issue a beer manufacturer temporary permit upon request and payment of a $100 fee and would also authorize the department to issue a duplicate license when specified privileges are not going to be exercised at a branch office. The bill would eliminate the 30-day prohibition on retail sales of beer for a branch office with a duplicate license. Because the violation of a provision of a license is punishable as a misdemeanor, the bill expands the definition of an existing crime, thereby creating a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Apr 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Signed Sep 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 14, 2014 · Assembly Aug 29, 2014
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 14, 2014
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-2)
assembly
Aug 28, 2014
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6676.).
lower
Aug 28, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 28).
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Aug 14, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 12, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 8, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 9, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 2, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 3, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2010
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2010. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline