Education finance: categorical programs.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes local educational agencies, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires a school district that receives funding on behalf of a charter school pursuant to certain provisions, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to continue to distribute the funds to those charter schools based on the same relative proportion that the school district distributed in the 2007–08 fiscal year, as adjusted by the school district to reflect changes in charter school attendance in the school district. Existing law requires a local educational agency to report expenditures of these funds to the State Department of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to allocate a supplemental categorical block grant to a charter school that began operation on or after the 2008–09 fiscal year, as specified. This bill would delete the 2014–15 fiscal year termination dates and would require, commencing with the 2014–15 fiscal year, the apportionments from the categorical education programs, as described above, to be apportioned to recipients by multiplying the recipient's per-pupil rate, calculated as specified, by the recipient's current fiscal year average daily attendance. The bill would also require the department to adopt uniform definitions for reporting the expenditure of the funds and would require a local educational agency, as a condition of receiving the funds, to (A) report the expenditure of those funds to the department, as specified, and (B) post information on the Internet Web site of the local educational agency on the expenditure of the funds at the school district level on a per pupil basis and identify separately the amount expended at each schoolsite on a per pupil basis. By requiring school districts to continue to distribute funds to charter schools, as discussed above, beyond the 2014–15 fiscal year, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 29, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Jan 15, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 4, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jan 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 200
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 200. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline