Postsecondary education: intersegmental coordination in governance.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California State University, the University of California, and the California Community Colleges as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. The missions and functions of these segments are set forth, among other things, in the Donahoe Higher Education Act. Provisions of the Donahoe Higher Education Act apply to the University of California only to the extent that the regents act, by resolution, to make them applicable. This bill would express the intent of the Legislature that the segments of public higher education coordinate their efforts to invest state resources in technologies that are useful to multiple segments or campuses. The bill would add a provision to the Donahoe Higher Education Act requiring the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges and the Chancellor of the California State University, and requesting the President of the University of California, to coordinate the efforts of their respective segments when procuring systemwide information technology and software for the purposes of enhancing student achievement. The bill would specify that the coordination it requires would apply only to large-scale information technology and software purchases that benefit the 3 segments of public postsecondary education and for which coordination by these segments would reduce costs and increase efficiency. The bill would further provide that, as the public segments of higher education invest in, and upgrade, infrastructure and software for data storage and analysis, these segments shall develop procedures to coordinate the collection of, and to share, student performance data in a manner that is consistent with state and federal privacy law. Because these provisions would be added to the Donahoe Higher Education Act, they would apply to the University of California only to the extent that the regents act, by resolution, to make them applicable.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 19, 2014
Vetoed Sep 19, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 7, 2014 · Assembly May 29, 2014
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
Aug 7, 2014
D
Democratic28
78% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 19, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6038.).
lower
Aug 7, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-6)
senate
Aug 7, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, be amended, and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 29, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-1-2)
assembly
May 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
May 14, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 2, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 20, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1969
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1969. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline