Evidence: admissibility of statements.
Summary
Existing law, known as the "hearsay rule," provides that, at a hearing, evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated is inadmissible. Existing law also provides exceptions to the hearsay rule to permit the admission of specified kinds of evidence. Among other exceptions, evidence of a statement or other conduct by a declarant that is inconsistent with a statement by that declarant received in evidence as hearsay evidence is not inadmissible for the purpose of attacking the credibility of the declarant, as specified. This bill would prohibit a criminal defendant, for the purpose of attacking his or her own credibility as a hearsay declarant, from introducing evidence of a statement or other conduct that is inconsistent with a statement made by the criminal defendant that has been received in evidence as hearsay evidence.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2014
Last action Jun 5, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 3, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1958
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1958. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline