Jails and juvenile facilities: telephone service contracts.
Summary
Existing law imposes specified procedural and substantive content requirements on contracts entered into by local agencies, including cities and counties. This bill would require any contract to provide telephone services to any person detained or sentenced to a jail or juvenile facility to be negotiated and awarded to an entity that meets the jail or juvenile facility's technical, functional, and security requirements for services, and that provides the lowest cost of service to any person who pays for the telephone service. The bill would prohibit any contract to provide telephone services to any person detained or sentenced to a jail or juvenile facility from including any commission or other payment, as defined, to the entity operating the jail or juvenile facility. The bill would further require that telephone rates affected by these provisions be reduced in response to the elimination of commission fees and require that current contracts for these telephone services, as specified, be amended to eliminate commission fees or other payments by a specified date. Because this bill would require new actions by local jail officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2014
How they voted
41–20
Passed · 16 other
Total votes 77
May 23, 2014
D
Democratic55
67% Yea
R
Republican22
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 17, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 10, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 23, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-20-16)
assembly
Apr 24, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 10, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 20, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Quirk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1876
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1876. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline