Child custody evaluations: confidentiality.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a court, in any contested child custody or visitation rights proceeding, to appoint a child custody evaluator to conduct a child custody evaluation, as specified, if the court determines it is in the best interests of the child. Existing law requires the child custody evaluator, if directed by the court, to file a written confidential report on his or her evaluation at least 10 days before any hearing regarding the custody of the child with the clerk of the court, as specified. Existing law requires this report to be served on the parties or their attorneys, and any other counsel appointed for the child. Existing law otherwise prohibits the disclosure of the report, except in certain probate guardianship proceedings, as specified. Existing law requires the information from a report containing psychological evaluations of a child or recommendations regarding custody or visitation submitted to the court in any proceeding involving child custody or visitation rights to be contained in a document that is to be placed in the confidential portion of the court file. Existing law applies this requirement to, among other things, the written confidential report described above, child custody or visitation recommendations made to the court pursuant to mediation proceedings, and a written statement of issues and contentions put forth by a child's appointed counsel. Existing law prohibits these reports and recommendations from being disclosed, except to specified persons, including, among others, a party to the proceeding or his or her attorney, a federal or state law enforcement officer, a court employee acting within the scope of his or her duties, a child's appointed counsel, or any other person upon order of the court for good cause. This bill would additionally authorize the disclosure of this confidential information to the licensing entity of a child custody evaluator and would prescribe the manner in which the licensing entity is authorized to use the confidential information disclosed to it, as specified. This bill would make a clarifying change to authorize the disclosure of a child custody evaluator's written confidential report pursuant to the provisions described above. The bill would delete an obsolete provision relating to the written statement of issues and contentions put forth by a child's appointed counsel. (2) Existing law requires a board, as defined, within the Department of Consumer Affairs, upon receipt of any complaint respecting a licensee, to notify the complainant of the initial and final action taken on his or her complaint, as specified. Existing law requires the board, when it deems appropriate, to notify the person against whom the complaint is made of the nature of the complaint and authorizes the board to request appropriate relief for the complainant and to meet and confer with the complainant and the licensee in order to mediate the complaint. This bill would, notwithstanding any other law, require the board, upon receipt of a child custody evaluation report, as specified, to notify the noncomplaining party in the underlying child custody dispute, who is a subject of that report, of the pending investigation.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Aug 2014
Introduced Feb 18, 2014
Signed Aug 25, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 7, 2014 · Assembly Aug 11, 2014
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
Aug 7, 2014
D
Democratic28
78% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Aug 25, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 11, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0)
assembly
Aug 11, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5959.).
lower
Aug 7, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-6)
senate
Aug 7, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jul 1, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 9, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 15, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 29, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1843
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1843. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline