Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act: employees.
Summary
Existing law, known as the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, contains provisions relating to employer-employee relations between the state and the employees of state institutions of higher education, including the University of California and the California State University, as well as the Hastings College of the Law. These provisions assign major responsibilities for implementation to the Public Employment Relations Board. Under the act, an "employee" or "higher education employee" is defined as any employee of the Regents of the University of California, the Directors of the Hastings College of the Law, or the Trustees of the California State University. The act authorizes the board to find that student employees whose employment is contingent on their status as students are employees only if the services they provide are unrelated to their educational objectives, or that those educational objectives are subordinate to the services they perform and that coverage under this act would further the purposes of the act. This bill would instead provide that student employees whose employment is contingent upon their status as students are employees and higher education employees for purposes of the act. The act excludes from the "scope of representation," for purposes of the University of California only, among other things, conditions for the award of certificates and degrees to students. This bill would specify that the requirements for students to achieve satisfactory progress toward their degrees is also outside of the scope of representation.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
47–21
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 70
May 28, 2014
D
Democratic50
94% Yea
R
Republican20
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-21-2)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 23).
lower
May 7, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 20, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 10, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Feb 19, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
Anthony Rendon
DDemocratic
Co
Hannah-Beth Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Co
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
Co
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1834
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1834. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline