Registration and licensing of firearms: City of Oakland.
Summary
Existing law states that it is the intent of the Legislature to occupy the whole field of regulation of registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms and that provisions of existing law are exclusive of all local regulations relating to registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms, as specified. Existing law makes a person guilty of carrying a concealed firearm under specified circumstances. Existing law makes a person guilty of openly carrying an unloaded handgun when that person carries upon his or her person an exposed and unloaded handgun outside a vehicle while in or on specified locations. Existing law specifies that those provisions are not applicable to a person who carries any handgun anywhere within the person's place of residence, place of business, or on specified property. Existing law prohibits a permit or license to purchase a handgun from being required of any person to purchase, own, possess, keep, or carry, a handgun within the person's place of residence, place of business, or on specified property. This bill would authorize the City of Oakland to enact an ordinance or regulation, applicable solely to its residents and in accordance with federal law, that is more restrictive than state law regulating the registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms. The bill would also provide that those provisions relating to the carrying of a handgun within the person's place of residence, place of business, or on specified property do not affect the application of the aforementioned authorization to the City of Oakland. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations regarding the need for special legislation.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Jan 24, 2013
Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2013
How they voted
36–24
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 64
May 28, 2013
D
Democratic43
83% Yea
R
Republican21
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 28, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-24-4)
assembly
May 8, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 7).
lower
May 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 2, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 25, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 180
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 180. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline