Dependent children: placement.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a peace officer to take a child into temporary custody under certain circumstances, including if he or she has reasonable cause for believing that the child is the victim of abuse or neglect. Under existing law, if the child is not released to his or her parent or guardian, the juvenile court is required to hold certain hearings to determine whether the child should be adjudged a dependent of the juvenile court, including a detention hearing, jurisdictional hearing, and disposition hearing. Under existing law, if an able and willing relative or nonrelative extended family member, as defined, is available and requests temporary placement of the child pending the detention hearing, the county welfare department is required to initiate an assessment of the relative's or nonrelative extended family member's suitability, as specified. This bill would expand this provision to apply to an able and willing relative or nonrelative extended family member who requests temporary placement of the child after the detention hearing and pending the dispositional hearing. By requiring the county welfare department to conduct these additional assessments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires that preferential consideration be given to a request by a relative of a child who has been adjudged a dependent of the juvenile court for placement of the child with the relative, as specified. Existing law requires the county social worker, in determining whether placement with a relative is appropriate, to consider certain factors, including the placement of siblings and half-siblings in the same home, if that placement is found to be in the best interest of each of the children. Existing law also requires that, in any case in which more than one appropriate relative requests preferential consideration, each relative be considered under those factors. This bill would require the county social worker, in determining whether placement with a relative is appropriate, to consider the placement of siblings and half-siblings in the same home, unless that placement would be contrary to the safety and well-being of any of the siblings. The bill would also state that these provisions do not limit the county social worker's ability to place a child in the home of an appropriate relative or a nonrelative extended family member pending the consideration of other relatives who have requested preferential consideration. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 14, 2014
Signed Sep 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2014 · Assembly May 23, 2014
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 40
Aug 20, 2014
D
Democratic28
85% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-5)
senate
Aug 20, 2014
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
May 23, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-6)
assembly
May 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1761
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1761. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline