Public works: prevailing wage rates: wage and penalty assessments.
Summary
Existing law generally requires the payment of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work, as defined, is performed and the prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work fixed to employees employed on public works projects that cost more than $1,000. Existing law requires the Labor Commissioner to issue a civil wage and penalty assessment to a contractor or subcontractor, or both, if the Labor Commissioner determines, after investigation, that the contractor or subcontractor, or both, violated the laws regulating public works contracts, including the payment of prevailing wages. Existing law permits the affected contractor or subcontractor to obtain review of a civil wage and penalty assessment or a notice of withholding, as defined. Existing law provides that, after 60 days following the service of a civil wage and penalty assessment or notice, the affected contractor, subcontractor, and surety on a bond issued to secure the payment of wages, as provided, become liable for liquidated damages in an amount equal to the amount of unpaid wages, as specified. Existing law authorizes a contractor, subcontractor, or surety to deposit the full amount of the assessment or notice, including penalties, with the Department of Industrial Relations to hold in escrow pending administrative or judicial review and to be distributed, as specified. Under existing law, if so deposited, there would be no liability for liquidated damages. This bill would specify that a contractor, subcontractor, or surety may deposit the full amount of the assessment or notice with the Department of Industrial Relations in the form of cash or a bond issued by a surety company admitted to do business in California in a form acceptable to the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. The bill would require the director to prescribe the requirements for a bond deposited pursuant to these provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 7, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 27, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Frazier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1741
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1741. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline