Disorderly conduct: prostitution.
Summary
Existing law provides that a person is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor, when a person solicits or agrees to engage in or engages in any act of prostitution, as defined. Existing law imposes certain additional requirements on an accusatory pleading charging a violation of those provisions, and provides for certain enhanced penalties for violations of those provisions, if the defendant has been previously convicted of a violating those provisions. This bill would instead provide that a person who solicits or who agrees to engage in or who engages in any act of prostitution in exchange for his or her receipt of money or other consideration from another person is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor. The bill would also provide that a person who solicits or who agrees to engage in or who engages in any act of prostitution in exchange for his or her payment, or offer to pay, another person money or other consideration, is guilty of disorderly conduct. The bill would make that offense punishable by confinement in a county jail for a minimum of 48 hours and a maximum of 6 months, and by a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $10,000. If the other person is a minor, as defined, 16 years of age or older, the bill would make that offense punishable by confinement in the state prison for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years, and by a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $25,000. If the other person is a minor, as defined, 16 years of age or younger, the bill would make that offense punishable by confinement in the state prison for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years, by a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $25,000, and by requiring the defendant to register as a sex offender. The bill would also impose additional requirements on an accusatory pleading charging a violation of its provisions, and require certain enhanced penalties for multiple convictions of violations of its provisions or certain existing provisions of law. By creating new crimes and increasing the obligations of county jail facilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Mar 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 27, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1718
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1718. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline