Driver's licenses: nondiscrimination.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to issue an original driver's license to a person who is unable to submit satisfactory proof that the applicant's presence in the United States is authorized under federal law if he or she meets all other qualifications for licensure and provides satisfactory proof to the department of his or her identity and California residency. Existing law makes it a violation of law, including, but not limited to, a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, to discriminate against an individual because he or she holds or presents a driver's license issued under these provisions. This bill would additionally make it a violation of the California Fair Housing and Employment Act (FEHA) for an employer or other covered entity to discriminate against an individual because he or she holds or presents a driver's license issued under these provisions or to require a person to present a driver's license, except as specified. The bill would making conforming changes to FEHA to specify that discrimination on the basis of national origin includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a driver's license granted under these provisions. The bill would also prohibit a governmental authority, or agent of a governmental authority, or person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, from discriminating against an individual because he or she holds or presents a license issued pursuant to those provisions. The bill would provide that an action taken by an employer to comply with any requirement or prohibition under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act is not a violation of law. Existing law also prohibits using a driver's license issued under these provisions as a basis for a criminal investigation, arrest, or detention in circumstances where a person whose driver's license was not issued under these provisions would not be criminally investigated, arrested, or detained. This bill would make the prohibition against using a driver's license issued under those provisions as a basis for an investigation, arrest, or detention apply to citations and also apply regardless of whether the investigation, arrest, citation, or detention is criminal. This bill would prohibit the DMV from disclosing to the public the information it obtains regarding the ineligibility of an applicant for a social security number, except as specified. The bill would provide that any document provided by an applicant to the DMV for purposes of proving his or her identity, true, full name, or California residency, or that the applicant's presence in the United States is authorized under federal law, is not a public record. The bill would also make driver's license information obtained by an employer exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 12, 2014
Signed Sep 19, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2014 · Assembly May 1, 2014
How they voted
24–3
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 36
Aug 27, 2014
D
Democratic26
84% Yea
R
Republican10
30% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 19, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-3-9)
senate
Aug 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 6581.).
lower
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 11, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 10).
upper
May 15, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 1, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-14-11)
assembly
Apr 29, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 28, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 24, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 26, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 25, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 20, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 13, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1660
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1660. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline