CalWORKs: benefits overpayment.
Summary
Existing law establishes various social services programs that provide cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families and individuals, including the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program. Existing law requires applicants for, and recipients of, public social services for which state grants-in-aid are made to counties to accurately report facts material to eligibility and grant payment determinations. Existing law authorizes current and future grants payable to an assistance unit to be reduced because of prior overpayments, and requires grant payments to be reduced by 5% of the maximum aid payment when the overpayment was caused by agency error or 10% of the maximum aid payment when the overpayment was for any other reason. Existing law prohibits a county from attempting, if an individual is no longer receiving CalWORKs benefits, to recover overpayments when the outstanding overpayments are less than $35, and requires reasonable cost-effective efforts at collection to be implemented if the overpayment amounts owed are $35 or more. Under existing law, however, a county is prohibited from establishing a CalWORKs overpayment based on any differences between the amount of income the county prospectively determined for the recipient and the income the recipient actually received, if the recipient's report was complete and accurate. Existing law provides that no civil or criminal action may be commenced against a person based on alleged unlawful application for or receipt of public social services if the case record of the person has been destroyed after the required retention period. This bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to establish a minimum cost-effectiveness threshold, as specified, for collecting an overpayment established under CalWORKs that is greater than $125, and would require counties to implement the new threshold if one is established by the department pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require current and future grant payments be reduced by 5% of the monthly payment when the overpayment is because of agency error or 10% of the monthly payment when the overpayment was for any other reason. The bill would prohibit a county from establishing an overpayment if the costs of collecting the outstanding payments are expected to exceed the average amounts to be recovered by the county, or the amount of the overpayment is less than $125, or the minimum cost-effectiveness threshold, whichever is greater. The bill would prohibit a county from attempting to recover CalWORKs overpayments if an individual is no longer receiving CalWORKs benefits and the outstanding overpayments are less than $125, or the minimum cost-effectiveness threshold, whichever is greater. The bill would also prohibit a civil, administrative, or criminal action against a person based on alleged unlawful or erroneous application for or receipt of public social services if the case record of the person has been destroyed after the required retention period. The bill would require the department to issue an all-county letter or similar instructions by April 1, 2015, and to adopt regulations to implement the provisions of the bill by July 1, 2016. By increasing the duties of county agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. Existing law continuously appropriates moneys from the General Fund to defray a portion of county costs under the CalWORKs program. This bill would instead provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for purposes of implementing the bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2014
How they voted
48–23
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 77
May 23, 2014
D
Democratic55
87% Yea
R
Republican22
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jun 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 15, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 12, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 10).
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 23, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-23-6)
assembly
May 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 21).
lower
May 8, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 14, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 7, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1613
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1613. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline