Sexually violent predators.
Summary
Existing law provides for the civil commitment of criminal offenders who have been determined to be sexually violent predators for treatment in a secure state hospital facility, as specified. Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to refer a prisoner for evaluation by the State Department of State Hospitals when the secretary determines that the person may be a sexually violent predator and specifies the judicial processes necessary for civil commitment as a sexually violent predator, including, but not limited to, the right to a jury trial. Existing law establishes provisions by which a committed person may petition for conditional release. Existing law requires the court, if it decides a petition for conditional release is not frivolous, to give notice, as specified, at least 30 court days prior to the hearing date for the petition. Existing law requires a person who is conditionally released pursuant these provisions to be placed in the county of the domicile of the person prior to the person's incarceration, unless the court finds that extraordinary circumstances require placement outside the county of domicile. This bill would recast these provisions to require the court, if it determines that the petition is not frivolous, to give notice of the court's intention to conduct a conditional release hearing. The bill would require the person petitioning for conditional release, the Director of State Hospitals, and the designated attorney of the county of commitment to notify the court within 30 court days of receipt of this notice if it appears that a county other than the county of commitment may be the county of domicile. The bill would provide that the court's determination of the county of domicile would govern the current petition for conditional release, and would apply to any subsequent petitions for conditional release. The bill would require that after determining the county of domicile, the court set a date for the conditional release hearing and provide notice, as specified. The bill would authorize the designated attorney for the county of domicile and the designated attorney for the county of commitment, as defined, to mutually agree that the designated attorney for the county of domicile will represent the state at the conditional release hearing if the county of domicile is different than the county of commitment. If the designated attorneys do not make that agreement, the bill would provide that the designated attorney for the county of commitment will represent the state at the conditional release hearing, as specified. The bill would provide that if the committed person has been conditionally released in a county other than the county of commitment, the jurisdiction of the person would be transferred to the court of the county of placement, unless the designated attorney in the county of placement objects, as provided. The bill would additionally require that a person who is conditionally released pursuant to these provisions be placed in the county of the domicile of the person prior to the person's incarceration, unless the designated county of placement was given prior notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed placement of the committed person in the county, as specified. By imposing additional duties on counties in regard to conditional releases of committed persons, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 5, 2014
Signed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2014 · Assembly May 23, 2014
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 27, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
14
Committee
13
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Aug 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6561.).
lower
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 23, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-3)
assembly
May 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 7, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
May 7, 2014
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on May 6 corrected.
lower
May 5, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 25, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 24, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 14, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 6, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SF
Steve Fox
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1607
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1607. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline