School facilities: construction contracts.
Summary
Existing law requires, until January 1, 2019, the governing board of a school district that enters into a contract for a public project, as defined, for which the board uses moneys received pursuant to the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 or moneys from future state school bonds for a public project that involves a projected expenditure of $1,000,000 or more, to require prospective bidders for a construction contract to complete and submit a standardized prequalification questionnaire and financial statement. Existing law requires the questionnaire and statement to be verified under oath by the bidder and for the district to adopt and apply a uniform system of rating bidders on the basis of the questionnaire and statement. Existing law authorizes the governing board to lease real property for a minimum rental of $1 per year if the instrument by which this property is leased requires the lessee to construct or provide for the construction of a building to be used by the district. Existing law also authorizes the governing board to enter into an agreement with the lowest responsible bidder to construct, or provide for the construction of, a building to be leased and used by the district upon a designated site. Existing law requires the instrument to provide that the title to the building and site to vest in the district at the end of the lease. This bill would, until January 1, 2019, require the lease instrument and the agreement with the lowest responsible bidder to include a requirement for the person, firm, or corporation that constructs a building to be leased and used by the school district upon a designated site, including, but not limited to, the prime contractor and, if used, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing subcontractors, to comply with the above-described prequalification questionnaire and financial statement requirements when the agreement is for a public project using moneys received pursuant to the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 or moneys from future state school bonds that involves a projected expenditure of $1,000,000 or more. By requiring additional persons to complete a questionnaire and statement that is verified under oath and increasing the duties of local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also, among other things, require the governing board to establish a process to prequalify a person, firm, or corporation, including, but not limited to, the prime contractor and, if used, an electrical, mechanical, and plumbing subcontractor, to construct the leased building on a quarterly or annual basis, which would be valid for one calendar year following the date of the initial prequalification. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 3, 2014
Signed Sep 18, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2014 · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
22–9
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 20, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 18, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-9-4)
senate
Aug 20, 2014
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Jun 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 18, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-15-2)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 23).
lower
May 7, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 10, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 1, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 4, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1581
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1581. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline