Residential care facilities for the elderly: licensing and regulation.
Summary
Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure of residential care facilities for the elderly by the State Department of Social Services. Existing law requires any person seeking a license for a residential care facility for the elderly to file an application with the department, as specified. Among other required application information, if the applicant is a firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, corporation, or company, evidence of reputable and responsible character is required to be submitted as to the members or shareholders thereof, and the person in charge of the residential care facility for the elderly for which the application for issuance of license or special permit is made. This bill would, among other things, delete the above requirement to submit evidence of reputable and responsible character as to members or shareholders of a firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, corporation, or company and the person in charge of the facility, and instead would require the applicant to disclose whether the licensee is a for-profit or not-for-profit provider, the names and license numbers of other facilities owned, managed, or operated by the same licensee, and the names and addresses of any persons or organizations listed as owner of record in the real estate, including the buildings and grounds appurtenant to the buildings. The bill would require an applicant to provide additional information, including, but not limited to, the applicant's history of compliance with the requirements imposed under specified facility licenses or a similarly licensed facility, applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and requirements governing the operators of those facilities. The bill would also require that specified applicant information be cross checked with the State Department of Public Health to determine if the applicant has a prior history of operating, holding a position in, or having ownership in, specified licensed facilities. Existing law requires the Director of Social Services to establish an automated license information system on licensees and former licensees of licensed residential care facilities for the elderly. The system is required to maintain a record of any information that may be pertinent for licensure. A violation of the provisions of the act is a crime. This bill would require the department, among other things, by July 1, 2015, to post on its Internet Web site residential care facility for the elderly profiles, with specified data. The bill would require, upon completion of a new community care licensing data system, or as soon as the current data system permits, each licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly to submit a profile of resident characteristics to the department on an annual basis, including, but not limited to, the number of residents in the facility who are bedridden, nonambulatory, receiving hospice care, have one or more allowable health conditions, have one or more restricted or prohibitive health conditions, or who have dementia. The bill would also require the department to develop and implement a ratings system by July 1, 2019, as provided. Because the bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law authorizes the department to deny any application for a residential care facility for the elderly license or to suspend or revoke those licenses on certain grounds, including, but not limited to, a violation by the licensee of applicable provisions or of the rules and regulations adopted under those provisions, conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility or the people of the state, or engaging in acts of financial malfeasance concerning the operation of a facility. This bill would require the department to deny an application for licensure or authorize it to subsequently revoke a license on the grounds that the applicant knowingly made a false statement of fact with regard to information that was required by the application for licensure, and would authorize the department to deny an application for licensure or subsequently revoke a license on the grounds that the applicant did not disclose enforcement actions on the application as required. The bill would also authorize the department to deny an application for licensure on the grounds that the applicant has a history of noncompliance with the requirements imposed under specified facility licenses or a similarly licensed facility in another state, applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and the requirements governing the operators of those facilities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 30, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
64–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 28, 2014
D
Democratic50
100% Yea
R
Republican20
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
2
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 26, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) .
lower
May 21, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 17, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jan 31, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1571
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1571. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline