Attorneys: duties.
Summary
Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the regulation and licensure of attorneys by the State Bar of California. Existing law imposes various duties on an attorney, including the duty to maintain the confidences and preserve the secrets of his or her client at every peril to himself or herself. Existing law authorizes the Board of Trustees of the State Bar, with the approval of the Supreme Court, to formulate and enforce rules of professional conduct for all members of the State Bar. Existing law requires the State Bar, if a client files a complaint alleging that his or her trust fund is being mishandled, to investigate and, if the State Bar determines that circumstances warrant, to require an audit. This bill would additionally impose on an attorney the duty to deposit into a client trust account funds received in advance from, or for, the client for fees, costs, or expenses for legal services, which are to be withdrawn by the attorney only as fees are earned or costs or expenses are incurred. The bill would authorize specified legal services to be provided in stages, and would authorize an attorney to withdraw fees when he or she has performed and completed a specified stage or stages, if the agreement with the client specifies each stage and sets the amount of the advance fee for each stage. The bill would provide that any fee that is paid in advance as the set amount of the fee for specified legal services, whether paid as a "fixed" fee, a "flat" fee, or under any other label, is earned only when the attorney has performed and completed the legal services agreed to be provided in exchange for that fee. The bill would require the State Bar to adopt for approval by the Supreme Court any necessary amendments to its rules of professional conduct to conform with this provision.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 15, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2014
How they voted
65–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 70
May 23, 2014
D
Democratic50
94% Yea
R
Republican20
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 23, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-5)
assembly
May 8, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 8, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 24, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 20, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 16, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1515
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1515. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline