Corrections: inmate transfers.
Summary
Existing law, until July 1, 2015, authorizes the board of supervisors of a county where, in the opinion of the county sheriff or the director of the county department of corrections, adequate facilities are not available for prisoners, to enter into an agreement with any other county whose county adult detention facilities are adequate for and accessible to the first county and requires the concurrence of the receiving county's sheriff or the director of the county department of corrections. Existing law also requires a county entering into a transfer agreement with another county to report annually to the Board of State and Community Corrections on the number of offenders who otherwise would be under that county's jurisdiction but who are now being housed in another county's facility and the reason for needing to house the offenders outside the county. This bill would extend the operation of those provisions until July 1, 2018, and would clarify that the agreement between counties would be to permit commitment of sentenced misdemeanants, felons sentenced to serve a term in a county jail, and any person required to serve a term of imprisonment in county adult detention facilities as a condition of probation. Existing law, operative July 1, 2015, authorizes a county where adequate facilities are not available for prisoners who would otherwise be confined in its county adult detention facilities to enter into an agreement with the board or boards of supervisors of one or more nearby counties whose county adult detention facilities are adequate for, and are readily accessible from, the first county for the commitment of misdemeanants and persons required to serve a term of imprisonment in a county adult detention facility as a condition of probation in jail in a county that is party to the agreement. Existing law, operative July 1, 2015, requires these agreements to provide for the support of a person so committed or transferred by the county from which he or she is committed. This bill would instead make those provisions operative July 1, 2018. This bill would make a related statement of legislative intent regarding inmate transfer agreements between nonadjacent counties.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Assembly Passage
Mar 2014
Senate Passage
Jun 2014
Signed into Law
Jun 2014
Introduced Jan 14, 2014
Signed Jun 23, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Jun 5, 2014 · Assembly Mar 20, 2014
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Jun 5, 2014
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jun 23, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 9, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5440.).
lower
Jun 5, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Jun 5, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
May 13, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 13).
upper
Mar 27, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 20, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-3)
assembly
Mar 17, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 11).
lower
Jan 23, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 15, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1512
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1512. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline