Protective orders.

Existing law authorizes a court with jurisdiction over a criminal matter to issue certain orders upon a good cause belief that harm to, or intimidation or dissuasion of, a victim or witness has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, including a protective order enjoining a party from, among other things, molesting, attacking, threatening, sexually assaulting, harassing, contacting, or coming within a specified distance of the other party, as specified. Existing law requires a court to consider issuing a protective order on its own motion in all cases where the defendant is charged with a crime of domestic violence, as defined, and requires the court's records of all criminal cases involving domestic violence be clearly marked to alert the court of the issue. Existing law provides that a restraining order or protective order issued in a domestic violence case has precedence in enforcement over a civil court order, except as provided. Existing law authorizes the court, in any case in which a complaint, information, or indictment charging domestic violence has been filed, to consider the underlying nature of the offense charged and other specified information in determining whether good cause exists to issue a protective order. This bill would apply these provisions to all cases where the defendant is charged with specified sex crimes, including rape, spousal rape, and crimes for which a person is required to register as a sex offender. The bill would further authorize the court, in any case in which a complaint, information, or indictment charging any of the above-described sex crimes has been filed, to consider the defendant's relationship to the victim, the likelihood of continuing harm to the victim, the defendant's criminal history, as specified, and any current protective or restraining order issued by any civil or criminal court involving the defendant. Existing law provides that a willful and knowing violation of a protective order issued pursuant to the above-described provisions constitutes contempt of court, a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by both the imprisonment and the fine, except as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 136.2 of the Penal Code, proposed by AB 1850 and SB 910, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective January 1, 2015, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.