Courts: destruction of court records.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the court clerk to destroy court records, as defined, after notice of destruction, if there is no request and order for transfer of the records, upon the expiration of specified time periods after final disposition of the case. This bill would revise and reorganize these provisions to, among other things, generally reduce the retention periods for court records, and would establish new retention periods for additional types of records, including proceedings for the revocation of postrelease community supervision. Existing law provides that a copy of a court record created, maintained, preserved, or reproduced according to specified standards shall be deemed an original court record and may be certified as a correct copy of the original record. This bill would authorize the clerk of the court to certify a copy of a court record by electronic or other technological means, if the means adopted by the court reasonably ensures that the certified copy is a true and correct copy of the original record, or of a specified part of the original record. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 68150 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1167 that would become operative only if this bill and AB 1167 are both enacted, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 9, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2013 · Assembly Aug 22, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Aug 19, 2013
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Sep 9, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0)
assembly
Aug 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2662.).
lower
Aug 19, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-2)
senate
Aug 19, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 26, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11).
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 23, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1352
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1352. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline