Prevailing wages: payroll records.
Summary
Existing law requires the Labor Commissioner, if the commissioner or his or her designee determines after an investigation that there has been a violation of the public works provisions, to issue a civil wage and penalty assessment to the contractor or subcontractor, or both. The assessment is required to be in writing, describe the nature of the violation and the amount of wages, penalties, and forfeitures due, and include the basis for the assessment. The assessment is required to be served not later than 180 days after the filing of a valid notice of completion in the office of the county recorder in each county in which the public work or some part thereof was performed, or not later than 180 days after acceptance of the public work, whichever occurs last. If the assessment is served after the expiration of the 180-day period, but before the expiration of an additional 180 days, and the awarding body has not yet made full payment to the contractor, the assessment is valid up to the amount of the funds retained. This bill would change the deadline for service of the assessment to not later than 18 months after the filing of a valid notice of completion in the office of the county recorder in each county in which the public work or some part thereof was performed, or not later than 18 months after acceptance of the public work, whichever occurs last. The bill would delete the provisions with regard to an assessment served after the expiration of the 180-day period. Existing law requires contractors engaged in public works to pay employees the prevailing wage, as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, and to comply with requirements relating to recordkeeping and employee work schedules. A joint labor-management committee, established pursuant to a specified provision of federal law, is authorized to bring an action against any employer who fails to pay prevailing wages as required by state law. The action is required to be commenced not later than 180 days after the filing of a valid notice of completion in the office of the county recorder in each county in which the public work, or some part thereof, was performed, or not later than 180 days after acceptance of the public work, whichever occurs last. This bill would delete the 180-day requirement and would instead require that the action be commenced not later than 18 months after the filing of a valid notice of completion in the office of the county recorder in each county in which the public work or some part thereof was performed, or not later than 18 months after acceptance of the public work, whichever occurs last. The bill would require, among other things, the court, in an action on prevailing wages, to award restitution to an employee for unpaid wages, plus interest, from the date the wages became payable, and liquidated damages equal to the amount of unpaid wages owed, and would authorize the imposition of civil penalties only against an employer that failed to pay the prevailing wage to its employees, injunctive relief, or any other appropriate equitable relief. Existing law requires each contractor and subcontractor to keep accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time, and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. Any copy of records made available for inspection by, or furnished to, a joint labor-management committee is required to be marked or obliterated only to prevent disclosure of an individual's name and social security number. This bill would instead require that any copy of payroll records made available for inspection by, or furnished to, a joint labor-management committee, established pursuant to federal law, is required to be marked or obliterated only to prevent disclosure of an individual's social security number. The bill would also require that any copy of records made available for inspection by, or furnished to, a multiemployer Taft-Hartley trust fund that requests the records for the purposes of allocating contributions to participants be marked or obliterated only to prevent disclosure of an individual's full social security number, but provide the last 4 digits of the social security number. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 13, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2013 · Assembly May 24, 2013
How they voted
24–9
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 36
Sep 3, 2013
D
Democratic26
88% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
12
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Oct 13, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 23. Page 2933.).
lower
Sep 4, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9-3)
senate
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
May 24, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-18-8)
assembly
May 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 15).
lower
Apr 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Frazier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1336
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1336. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline