Peace officers: airport law enforcement.
Summary
Existing law establishes categories of peace officers with varying powers and authority to make arrests and carry firearms. Existing law provides that a person who is employed as an airport law enforcement officer is a peace officer whose authority extends to any place in the state for the purpose of enforcing the law in or about the properties owned, operated, and administered by the peace officer's employing agency or when making an arrest if there is immediate danger to a person or property, or of an escape of the perpetrator of an offense. Existing law authorizes this category of peace officer to carry a firearm. This bill, if the Los Angeles Police Commission and the Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners enter into an agreement to enable the Inspector General of the Los Angeles Police Commission to conduct audits and investigations of the Los Angeles Airport Police Division, on or before April 1, 2014, would place an airport law enforcement officer regularly employed by Los Angeles World Airports, as defined, within a different category of peace officers whose authority extends to any place in the state without the above restrictions as to arrest powers and with the authority to carry specified firearms. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Los Angeles, relating to law enforcement at the Los Angeles International Airport.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Jan 15, 2013
Signed Oct 13, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly May 28, 2013
How they voted
27–6
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2013
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Oct 13, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-6-2)
senate
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 3216.).
lower
Sep 10, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
May 28, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-4-12)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (May 24).
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 13, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 24, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 128
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 128. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline