Youth offenders: security placement.
Summary
Existing law begins the term of imprisonment upon the actual delivery of a defendant into the custody of the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and requires the place of reception to be an institution under the direction of the Secretary. Existing regulations require that an inmate be assigned to a facility with a security level that corresponds to specified placement score ranges and establishes classification committees for making these determinations. This bill would require the department to conduct a youth offender Institutional Classification Committee review at reception to provide special classification consideration for every youth offender. The bill would require the department to consider placing a youth offender at a lower security level than corresponds with his or her classification score, or placing a youth offender in a facility that permits increased access to programs, based on the Institutional Classification Committee review and other factors, including, among others, the youth offenders recent in-custody behavior. The bill would require the department to transfer a youth offender to a lower security level facility if the department determines, based on a specified review, that he or she may appropriately be placed at a lower security level facility. The bill would require a youth offender who is denied a lower security level, or who did not qualify for a placement permitting increased access to programs, and is placed in the highest security level to be eligible to have his or her placement reconsidered at his or her annual review until age 25. The bill would require the department to revise existing regulations and adopt new regulations pursuant to these provisions, as necessary. The bill would make these provisions operative July 1, 2015.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 26, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2014 · Assembly May 30, 2013
How they voted
21–8
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 36
Aug 20, 2014
D
Democratic26
76% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
12
Committee
14
Amendments
3
Sep 26, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 16. Page 6536.).
lower
Aug 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 26).
lower
Aug 21, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 20, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-8-7)
senate
Aug 20, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 14).
upper
Jun 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 10, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 13, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-24-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 24).
lower
May 8, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 16, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1276
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1276. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline