Medi-Cal: CommuniCal.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing federal law provides for increased administrative funding for translation and interpretation services provided in connection with the enrollment, retention, and use of services under the Medicaid Program. This bill would require the department to establish the Medi-Cal Patient-Centered Communication program (CommuniCal) , to be administered by a 3rd-party administrator, to, commencing July 1, 2014, provide and reimburse for medical interpretation services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries who are limited English proficient (LEP) . This bill would establish the CommuniCal Program Fund in the State Treasury, which would consist of moneys dedicated to the CommuniCal program, to be used upon appropriation by the Legislature to the department solely to fund the CommuniCal program. Existing law provides for the certification of administrative hearing interpreters and medical examination interpreters for purposes of administrative adjudications. This bill would require the department to be the certifying body for CommuniCal certified medical interpreters (CCMIs) , and to authorize other interpreters meeting specified requirements, including a screening test, to provide CommuniCal services. The bill would require the department to (1) develop, monitor, and evaluate interpreter competency, qualifications, training, certification, and continuing education, (2) by September 1, 2014, approve an examination and certification process to test and certify the competency of medical interpreters, and (3) maintain a registry of those persons who meet the requirements to provide CommuniCal services. The bill would require the department to establish the Community Advisory Committee for purposes of assisting the department in the above-described tasks. The bill would also require the department to establish and charge fees that do not exceed reasonable costs for applicants to take any department-administered examinations and be certified or authorized and listed in the registry, and would require the department, in consultation with the Community Advisory Committee, to adopt quality standards and medical interpretation certification requirements through regulations. The Ralph C. Dills Act provides for employer-employee relations between the state and its employees, as specified, including, among other things, the right of state employees to form, join, and participate in the activities of employee organizations for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations, as specified. This bill would provide that CommuniCal interpreters would have the right to form, join, and participate in the activities of a labor organization of their own choosing for the purpose of representation of specified employer-employee matters. The bill would provide that CommuniCal interpreters would not be considered state employees for purposes of the bill, but would have the right to be represented by an exclusive labor organization of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining with the state on matters of mutual concern, including their base reimbursement rate. The bill would provide that upon application by petition, authorization cards, or union membership cards of a labor organization adequately showing that a majority of CommuniCal interpreters in the state desire to be represented exclusively by that labor organization, and no other labor organization is currently certified as the exclusive representative, the Public Employment Relations Board shall certify and grant exclusive representation to that labor organization, and would establish other election procedures to be administered by that board. The bill would require that any agreement resulting from collective bargaining be legally binding upon the state and committed to writing, and would further require that, upon the completion of discussions and collective bargaining, any agreement be reduced to writing and be presented to the appropriate administrative, legislative, or other governing body in the form of a binding agreement, resolution, bill, law, or other form required for adoption. The bill would provide that, after the certification of a labor organization, the state shall approve and have deducted, upon authorization in the case of dues deduction, from the appropriate reimbursement or other payment to the members of the labor organization the monthly amount of dues or service fees as certified by an executive officer of the labor organization, and shall transmit the amount to the treasurer of the labor organization.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
23–8
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2013
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
12
Committee
14
Amendments
5
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 13, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-8-4)
senate
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 3244.).
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 10, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and HEALTH.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-20-1)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) .
lower
May 1, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 15, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 10).
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1263
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1263. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline