Superior court security.
Summary
Existing law, the Superior Court Security Act of 2012, requires a presiding judge to develop, in conjunction with the sheriff or marshall, an annual or multiyear comprehensive court security plan, as defined, that includes a mutually agreed upon law enforcement security plan, as defined, to be utilized by the court. The act requires the sheriff to attend all superior court sessions held within his or her county, whenever required, as specified. Existing law requires the sheriff, with the approval and authorization of the board of supervisors, and on behalf of the county, in those counties in which the sheriff's department provides court security services, to enter into an annual or multiyear memorandum of understanding with the superior court specifying an agreed-upon level of court security services and any other agreed-upon governing or operating procedures. Under the act, the sheriff is responsible for the necessary level of court security services, as established by the memorandum of understanding, except as specified. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
1
Committee
1
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1184
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1184. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline