Escrow agent rating service: escrow agents.
Summary
Existing law, the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, requires every consumer credit reporting agency, upon request and proper identification of any consumer, to allow the consumer to visually inspect all files maintained regarding that consumer at the time of the request. Existing law requires every consumer reporting agency to advise the consumer of the agency's obligation to provide a decoded written version of the file. Existing law grants the consumer the right to request and receive a decoded written version of the file. Existing law requires a consumer credit reporting agency to disclose the recipients of any consumer credit report on the consumer which the consumer credit reporting agency has furnished, as specified. Under existing law, a consumer credit reporting agency is required to furnish a consumer credit report only under certain circumstances, including in accordance with the written instructions of the consumer to whom it relates. Existing law prohibits a consumer credit reporting agency from making any consumer credit report containing specified information. Existing law requires every consumer credit reporting agency to maintain reasonable procedures designed to avoid disclosing certain information and to limit the furnishing of consumer credit reports to specified purposes. If the completeness or accuracy of any item of information in a consumer's file is disputed by the consumer, existing law requires the consumer credit reporting agency to reinvestigate and record the current status of the disputed information within a specified period of time. Existing law requires each consumer credit reporting agency that compiles and reports items of information that are matters of public record to specify the source from which that information was obtained. Existing law requires a person that procures a consumer credit report for the purpose of reselling the report to take specified actions. Existing law authorizes any consumer suffering damages as a result of a violation of the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act by any person to bring a court action for damages or injunctive relief, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2017, require an escrow agent rating service, as defined, to comply with the provisions described above. The bill would make an escrow agent rating service subject to the requirements applicable to a reseller of credit information if it acts in that capacity, as specified. The bill would also require an escrow agent rating service to establish policies and procedures to protect the personal information it obtains from escrow agents. The bill would authorize an escrow agent, as defined, who suffers damages as a result of the failure of an escrow agent rating service to comply with these provisions to bring a court action for specified damages.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
Apr 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 27, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2013 · Assembly Apr 25, 2013
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Sep 27, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3118.).
lower
Sep 9, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-2)
senate
Sep 9, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 10, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 28, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 9, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Apr 25, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-4)
assembly
Apr 23, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1169
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline