Court records: electronic forms.
Summary
Existing law governs the procedure for levying an execution lien upon real or personal property. Existing law requires the judgment creditor to give the levying officer written instructions containing the information needed or requested by the levying officer to serve the writ, order, notice, or other paper on a person. This bill would require instructions given to a levying officer to include specified information if the instructions are accompanied by a specified writ of execution issued by the court as an electronic record or document printed from an electronic record issued by the court. Except as specified, the bill would authorize the levying officer to proceed in the same manner as if in possession of a paper version of the original writ. Existing law authorizes courts to create and maintain court records in electronic forms and authorizes the signing and verification of specified trial court documents using a computer or other technology. Existing law also defines the term "court record" for purposes of the management of trial court records. This bill would additionally include a writ, subpoena, or other legal process as a trial court document that may be signed and verified using a computer or other technology. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 68150 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1352 that would become operative if this bill and AB 1352 are enacted, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
Apr 2013
Senate Passage
Jul 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Aug 27, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Jul 8, 2013 · Assembly Aug 8, 2013
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 34
Jul 8, 2013
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Aug 27, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 8, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-1)
assembly
Aug 8, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2471.).
lower
Aug 5, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 8, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-4)
senate
Jun 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 4).
upper
May 6, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 25, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 4, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1167
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1167. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline