Pupils: concurrent enrollment in secondary school and community college.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the principal of a school to recommend a pupil for community college summer session if the pupil meets certain criteria and requires, for any particular grade level, the principal to not recommend for community college summer session more than 5% of the total number of pupils who completed that grade immediately before the time of recommendation. Existing law, until January 1, 2014, requires a high school pupil recommended for enrollment in a community college course to not be included in the 5% limit if the course meets certain criteria and the principal provides the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges with specific data that is included in a report submitted to the Department of Finance. Existing law also, until January 1, 2014, requires the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to not include enrollment growth attributable to pupils not included in the 5% limit as part of its annual budget request for the California Community Colleges. This bill would extend the provisions related to high school pupils not included in the 5% limit, as described above, until January 1, 2019.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
63–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 64
May 29, 2013
D
Democratic43
97% Yea
R
Republican21
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-1)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 8, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1146
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1146. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline