AB 1127 California Assembly · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Legal aid: court interpreters.

Summary
Existing law requires, when a witness is incapable of understanding the English language or expressing himself or herself in the English language so as to be understood directly by counsel, court, and jury, an interpreter to be sworn to interpret for him or her. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to conduct a study of language and interpreter use and need in court proceedings, with commentary, and to report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and to the Legislature every 5 years. Existing law requires that this study serve as the basis for determining the need to establish interpreter programs and certification and for establishing these programs and examinations through the normal budgetary process. This bill would require the Judicial Council, by March 1, 2014, to establish a working group to review, identify, and develop best practices to provide interpreters in civil actions and proceedings, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to select up to 3 courts to participate in a pilot project, to commence on July 1, 2014, to provide interpreters in civil proceedings and would require the Judicial Council to report to the Legislature findings related to the pilot project by July 1, 2018. The pilot project would be funded by an amount not to exceed $6 million dollars from the Trial Court Trust Fund, upon allocation by the Judicial Council pursuant to the Judicial Council's existing expenditure authority, or upon appropriation by the Legislature, from unexpended funds previously allocated for court interpreter services. The bill would also require the working group to act as an advisory body to any Judicial Council committee, advisory board, or joint committee charged with developing a comprehensive statewide Language Access Plan (LAP) for use by courts to address the needs of all limited-English-proficient individuals in conformance with state and federal law. The bill would require the working group to make recommendations relating to the establishment of standards for meaningful and timely provision of language services in all court proceedings and at all public points of contact within the courts, and the establishment of a statewide plan to provide for the translation of court documents using competent and qualified interpreters. The bill would require the Judicial Council and its advisory bodies to submit an interim report to the Legislature on the status of the LAP by September 1, 2014. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2020.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Vetoed
Mar 2014
Introduced Feb 22, 2013 Vetoed Mar 6, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly May 30, 2013

How they voted

27–7
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 11, 2013
D Democratic26
24 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican10
3 Yea 7 Nay
70% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Mar 6, 2014
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 12, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-7-2)
senate
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 23. Page 3238.).
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 30, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-20-1)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 24).
lower
May 15, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors