Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria, executed on August 31, 2012. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions are not projects for purposes of CEQA.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
May 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
63–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 64
May 29, 2013
D
Democratic43
97% Yea
R
Republican21
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
15
Amendments
4
May 28, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 27, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 10, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 9, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and E.Q.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-1)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 15, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 2, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on J., E.D., & E.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on J., E.D., & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on J., E.D., & E.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1098
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1098. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline