Finance and mortgage lenders.
Summary
Existing law, the California Finance Lenders Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of finance lenders and brokers. Existing law, the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act, provides for the regulation and licensure of residential mortgage lenders, servicers, and originators. Existing law makes the Commissioner of Corporations responsible for administering the law and act until July 1, 2013, and thereafter the Deputy Commissioner of Business Oversight for the Division of Corporations will be responsible, pursuant to the Governor's Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 2012. A willful violation of the law or act is a crime. Existing law exempts, among others, California business and industrial development corporations, licensed pawnbrokers, and persons making no more than one commercial loan in a 12-month period from the California Finance Lenders Law. This bill would exempt from the California Finance Lenders Law California business and industrial development corporations when acting under federal law or other state authority, licensed pawnbrokers when acting under the authority of that license, and persons making 5 or fewer commercial loans in a 12-month period as long as the loans are incidental to the business of the person relying on the exemption. The bill would, among other things, prohibit a person, subject to the California Finance Lenders Law, from knowingly misrepresenting any material information regarding a transaction and committing any act that constitutes fraud or dishonest dealings. By expanding the definition of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Upon inspection, examination, or investigation, if the commissioner has cause to believe that a licensee under the California Finance Lenders Law or the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act is violating or has violated the respective law applicable to the licensee, or that any other person is violating those laws, the bill would authorize the commissioner or his or her designee to issue a written citation to the licensee or person that may contain an order to correct the violation or violations and an assessment of an administrative fine not to exceed $2,500. The bill would require the commissioner, if the commissioner after investigation has reasonable grounds to believe that a person is conducting business under the California Finance Lenders Law in an unsafe or injurious manner, to issue a written order directing the discontinuance of the unsafe or injurious practice. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 6, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2013 · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 19, 2013
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
12
Committee
15
Amendments
3
Sep 6, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2659.).
lower
Aug 19, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 19, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 7, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 7, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & F.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1091
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1091. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline