SB 984 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: record of proceedings.

Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency's action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA. This bill would require, until January 1, 2016, the lead agency, at the request of a project applicant for specified projects, to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, EIRs or other environmental documents for specified projects. Because the bill would require a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings as provided, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, for a lead agency that is a state agency, the consent of the state agency for the concurrent preparation of the record of proceedings. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would not become operative unless AB 1570 of the 2011–12 Regular Session of the Legislature is enacted on or before January 1, 2013.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Apr 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Jan 30, 2012 Last action Sep 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Apr 23, 2012 · Assembly Aug 27, 2012

How they voted

300
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Apr 23, 2012
D Democratic20
20 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 1, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 27, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-1-2)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Apr 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 20, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2968.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jan 30, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors