Payroll cards.
Summary
Existing law prohibits an employer from issuing in payment of wages due certain instruments, including an order, check, draft, note, memorandum, scrip, coupon, card, or other acknowledgment of indebtedness or redeemable instrument, unless specified requirements are satisfied. This bill would authorize an employer to pay an employee's wages by means of a payroll card, as defined, provided that specified requirements are satisfied. In addition, the bill would make a violation of its provisions a misdemeanor and would subject a violator to specified civil penalties. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 16, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 16, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 21. Noes 17. Page 2474.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 2499.)
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 2442.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-27-3)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 22).
lower
May 23, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
May 16, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-3)
senate
May 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 930.) (May 9).
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Co
WA
Wilmer Amina Carter
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 931
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 931. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline