Vehicles: child passenger restraints.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle, as defined, on a highway unless that person and all passengers 16 years of age or older are properly restrained by a safety belt. This bill would define the phrase "properly restrained by a safety belt" for purposes of those provisions. Existing law prohibits the operator of a limousine for hire or the operator of an authorized emergency vehicle, as defined, from operating the limousine for hire or authorized emergency vehicle, unless the operator and any passengers 6 years of age or over or weighing 60 pounds or more in the front seat are properly restrained by a safety belt. Existing law also prohibits the operator of a taxicab from operating the taxicab unless any passengers 6 years of age or older or weighing 60 pounds or more in the front seat are properly restrained by a safety belt. This bill would instead prohibit the operator of a limousine for hire or authorized emergency vehicle or the operator of a taxicab, from operating the limousine for hire, authorized emergency vehicle, or taxicab unless the operator and any passengers 8 years of age or older in the front seat are properly restrained by a safety belt. Existing law requires a child or ward under 6 years of age who weighs less than 60 pounds to be secured in a rear seat in a child passenger restraint system that meets specified federal standards, but permits such a child or ward to ride in the front seat of a motor vehicle if properly secured in a child passenger restraint system that meets specified federal standards, under specified circumstances, including, among other things, if all rear seats are already occupied by children under 12 years of age. This bill would instead prohibit a parent, legal guardian, or driver from transporting on a highway in a motor vehicle, as defined, a child or ward who is under 8 years of age without securing that child in an appropriate child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, except as provided. The bill would impose specified fines and penalties for violations of those requirements, as prescribed. Existing law authorizes a law enforcement officer reasonably suspecting a violation of those child passenger restraint system requirements to stop a vehicle transporting a child appearing to the officer to be within a specified age or weight range of under 6 years of age or less than 60 pounds. This bill would instead authorize a law enforcement officer reasonably suspecting a violation of those requirements to stop a vehicle transporting a child appearing to the officer to be within the age range of less than 8 years of age. Existing law permits a court to exempt from the above-described child passenger restraint system requirements any class of child by age, weight, or size if it is determined that the use of a child passenger restraint system would be impractical by reason of physical unfitness, medical condition, or size, and establishes 2 statutory exemptions. This bill would revise that provision to also specify that a child or ward under 8 years of age who is 4 feet 9 inches in height or taller may be properly restrained by a safety belt rather than a child passenger restraint system. Existing law requires every public or private hospital, clinic, or birthing center, at the time of the discharge of a child to provide and discuss information on the current law requiring child passenger restraint systems to the parents or person to whom the child is released when the child is less than 6 years of age or weighs less than 60 pounds. This bill would instead require a public or private hospital, clinic, or birthing center, at the time of the discharge of a child, to provide and discuss information on the current law requiring child passenger restraint systems, safety belts, and the transportation of children in rear seats to the parents or person to whom the child is released if the child is under 8 years of age. Existing law requires every car rental agency in California to inform each of its customers of a specified child safety restraint law by posting, in a place conspicuous to the public in each established place of business of the agency notice that meets specified requirements and includes a prescribed statement. This bill would revise the language that would be required to be included in the notice, with regard to the application of those child safety restraint laws to children under 8 years of age. Because a violation of the vehicle law constitutes a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of an existing crime. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 4, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011 · Assembly Aug 15, 2011
How they voted
24–11
Passed
Total votes 35
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Oct 4, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 2146.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 2043.)
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on T. & H. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 1957.) Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-26-4)
assembly
Aug 15, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-11)
senate
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 5, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 865.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 929
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 929. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline