Dependent children: relative placements: disclosure.
Summary
Existing law requires a court to appoint counsel for a child who is not represented by counsel in dependency proceedings, except as specified. Counsel for the child is required to investigate the interests of the child beyond the scope of the juvenile proceeding, and report to the court other interests of the child that may require protection in other administrative or judicial proceedings. Existing law requires that in any case in which a child is removed from the physical custody of his or her parents due to abuse or neglect, preferential consideration be given to a request by a relative of the child for placement of the child with the relative. This bill would authorize counsel for the child or counsel's agent to disclose to a relative who is being assessed for the possibility of placement of the child the fact that the child is in custody and other related information, as specified. The bill would state that the changes made by this measure are declaratory of existing law, and would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Signed into Law
Jul 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Jul 26, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 11, 2011 · Assembly Jun 27, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jul 11, 2011
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Jul 26, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 11, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1785.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Jun 27, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 14).
lower
May 23, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 765.) (April 26).
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 926
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 926. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline