Public contracts: public entities: project labor agreements.
Summary
Existing law sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities. This bill would authorize a public entity to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into, a project labor agreement for a construction project, if the agreement includes specified taxpayer protection provisions. This bill would authorize the members of the governing board of a local public entity to choose by majority vote whether to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into a project labor agreement for a specific project or projects awarded by that entity and whether to allocate funding to a specific project covered by such an agreement. This bill would prohibit a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance from preventing the governing board of a local public entity, other than a charter city, from exercising this authority on a project-specific basis. This bill would also provide that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits the governing board's consideration of a project labor agreement for a project to be awarded by the city, or prohibits the governing board from considering whether to allocate funds to a city-funded project covered by such an agreement, then state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support that project, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2011 · Assembly Sep 9, 2011
How they voted
31–0
Passed
Total votes 31
May 9, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
43
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
3
Oct 2, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-25-1)
assembly
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2480.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 2499.)
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2457.) Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (September 7).
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (September 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Sep 2, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (June 14).
lower
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0)
senate
May 3, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 676.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
MH
Mary Hayashi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 922
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 922. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline